University of
Illinois · Graduate School of Library and
Information Science ·
ISRL
music-ir.org || mirbib || IMIRSEL || M2K || modules
|| tools
|| MIREX
2005 MIREX Contest Results - Audio Drum Detection (Contest
wiki)
Goal: To detect the occurences of drum events in
polyphonic audio.
Dataset: At least 50 files of both live and sequenced
music, with many genres encompassed and various degrees of drum audio
contained
in the files. Three collections of music were used: Christian Dittmar
(CD),
Koen Tanghe (KT) and Masataka Goto (MG). Participants were evaluated
against
music from each individual collection, and then the three collection
scores
are averaged to produce a composite score.
|
OVERALL
|
|
Rank |
Participant |
Total Average Classification F-measure |
Total
Overall Onset Precision |
Total
Overall Onset Recall |
Total
Overall Onset F-measure |
BD
Average F-measure |
HH
Average F-measure |
SD
Average F-measure |
Runtime
(s) |
Machine
|
| 1
|
Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno
|
0.670
|
64.92%
|
67.02%
|
0.659
|
0.728
|
0.574
|
0.702
|
8534
|
B
0 |
| 2
|
Tanghe,
Degroeve, & De Baets 3 |
0.611
|
63.30%
|
71.19%
|
0.670
|
0.688
|
0.601
|
0.555
|
1337
|
Y |
| 3
|
Tanghe,
Degroeve, & De Baets 4 |
0.609
|
62.57%
|
71.09%
|
0.666
|
0.686
|
0.590
|
0.562
|
1342
|
Y |
| 4
|
Tanghe,
Degroeve, & De Baets 1 |
0.599
|
60.02%
|
72.45%
|
0.657
|
0.677
|
0.588
|
0.542
|
1350
|
Y |
| 5
|
Dittmar,
C. |
0.588
|
65.68%
|
63.38%
|
0.645
|
0.606
|
0.585
|
0.581
|
673
|
R |
| 6
|
Paulus,
J. |
0.499
|
59.61%
|
64.86%
|
0.621
|
0.527
|
0.587
|
0.430
|
1137
|
L |
| 7
|
Gillet & Richard 2 |
0.443
|
77.09%
|
40.63%
|
0.532
|
0.598
|
0.334
|
0.428
|
21248
|
F |
| 8
|
Gillet & Richard 1 |
0.391
|
69.84%
|
37.98%
|
0.492
|
0.533
|
0.343
|
0.317
|
21997
|
F |
|
CHRISTIAN DITTMAR COLLECTION
|
|
Rank |
Participant |
Total Average
Classification F-measure |
Total
Overall Onset Precision |
Total
Overall Onset Recall |
Total
Overall Onset F-measure |
BD
Average F-measure |
HH
Average F-measure |
SD
Average F-measure |
1
|
Dittmar, C. |
0.753 |
77.73% |
72.56% |
0.751 |
0.783 |
0.696 |
0.790 |
2
|
Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno |
0.690 |
64.25% |
62.75% |
0.660 |
0.714 |
0.533 |
0.811 |
3
|
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 3 |
0.595 |
61.85% |
64.85% |
0.633 |
0.685 |
0.568 |
0.548 |
4
|
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 4 |
0.589 |
62.45% |
64.22% |
0.628 |
0.668 |
0.555 |
0.559 |
5
|
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 1 |
0.580 |
57.78% |
65.94% |
0.616 |
0.669 |
0.553 |
0.533 |
| 6 |
Paulus, J. |
0.440 |
55.82% |
54.36% |
0.551 |
0.430 |
0.497 |
0.424 |
| 7 |
Gillet & Richard 2 |
0.401 |
77.22% |
30.16% |
0.434 |
0.658 |
0.156 |
0.364 |
| 8 |
Gillet & Richard 1 |
0.339 |
66.33% |
30.57% |
0.418 |
0.466 |
0.279 |
0.265 |
|
KOEN TANGHE COLLECTION
|
|
Rank |
Participant |
Total
Average Classification
F-measure |
Total
Overall Onset Precision |
Total
Overall Onset Recall |
Total
Overall Onset F-measure |
BD
Average F-measure |
HH
Average F-measure |
SD
Average F-measure |
| 1 |
Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno |
0.617 |
53.06% |
66.30% |
0.589 |
0.686 |
0.481 |
0.652 |
| 2 |
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 3 |
0.546 |
52.67% |
68.21% |
0.594 |
0.613 |
0.485 |
0.525 |
| 3 |
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 4 |
0.541 |
51.90% |
67.98% |
0.589 |
0.612 |
0.479 |
0.523 |
| 4 |
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 1 |
0.533 |
47.48% |
69.24% |
0.577 |
0.602 |
0.467 |
0.511 |
| 5 |
Dittmar, C. |
0.494 |
51.20% |
51.51% |
0.514 |
0.509 |
0.418 |
0.535 |
| 6 |
Paulus, J. |
0.425 |
55.82% |
55.10% |
0.555 |
0.444 |
0.489 |
0.412 |
| 7 |
Gillet & Richard 2 |
0.273 |
66.68% |
28.22% |
0.397 |
0.393 |
0.178 |
0.269 |
| 8 |
Gillet & Richard 1 |
0.259 |
58.48% |
26.11% |
0.361 |
0.375 |
0.196 |
0.210 |
|
MASATAKA GOTO COLLECTION (50 songs from
RWC Music Database: RWC-MDB-P-2001)
|
|
Rank |
Participant |
Total Average
Classification F-measure |
Total
Overall Onset Precision |
Total
Overall Onset Recall |
Total
Overall Onset F-measure |
BD
Average F-measure |
HH
Average F-measure |
SD
Average F-measure |
| 1 |
Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno |
0.716 |
76.13% |
69.16% |
0.725 |
0.776 |
0.661 |
0.710 |
2
|
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 4 |
0.685 |
72.32% |
75.83% |
0.740 |
0.766 |
0.691 |
0.599 |
3
|
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 3 |
0.683 |
72.74% |
75.65% |
0.742 |
0.763 |
0.701 |
0.585 |
| 4 |
Tanghe, Degroeve, & De
Baets 1 |
0.673 |
69.86% |
77.12% |
0.733 |
0.753 |
0.693 |
0.574 |
5
|
Gillet & Richard 2 |
0.630 |
81.60% |
53.00% |
0.643 |
0.774 |
0.517 |
0.599 |
6
|
Dittmar, C. |
0.617 |
71.37% |
67.78% |
0.695 |
0.631 |
0.675 |
0.544 |
7
|
Paulus, J. |
0.597 |
62.90% |
75.47% |
0.686 |
0.648 |
0.695 |
0.449 |
| 8 |
Gillet & Richard 1 |
0.544 |
76.11% |
48.80% |
0.595 |
0.715 |
0.479 |
0.436 |
Maintained by :J Stephen Downie
Comments to : jdownie at uiuc dot edu
Last modified: 5 September 2005