Difference between revisions of "Talk:Audio Genre"

From MIREX Wiki
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I like the idea of hierarchical genre categorization, and multiple labels. We should not be content with good performance on simple questions (since there are quite good systems on single genre classification problem.) I would like to see how "bad" the systems will be in harder problems.  
+
Genre problems are of great importance to music retrieval, because queries on genre are quite popular. Progresses in genre classification will enhance approaches in real retrieval problems.
  
Genre problems are of great importance to music retrieval, because queries on genre are quite popular. Progresses in genre classification will enhance approaches in real retrieval problems.
+
I like the idea of hierarchical genre categorization, and multiple labels. We should not be content with good performance on simple questions. I would like to see how "bad" the systems will be in harder problems. However, to evaluate harder problems, a good set of data is the key. Besides copyright issues, we need people (probably music librarians) to annotate and organize a reliable corpus.

Revision as of 17:15, 20 February 2005

Genre problems are of great importance to music retrieval, because queries on genre are quite popular. Progresses in genre classification will enhance approaches in real retrieval problems.

I like the idea of hierarchical genre categorization, and multiple labels. We should not be content with good performance on simple questions. I would like to see how "bad" the systems will be in harder problems. However, to evaluate harder problems, a good set of data is the key. Besides copyright issues, we need people (probably music librarians) to annotate and organize a reliable corpus.