Difference between revisions of "Talk:Symbolic Genre Class"

From MIREX Wiki
 
(I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification?
 
What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification?
 +
 +
== I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification ==
 +
 +
As users may have queries regarding different dimensions/facets/criteria, it is desirable to build classifiers on other dimensions than genre. I am particularly interested in predicting Hit/No-hit. It is cool to be a step ahead of fashion.
 +
 +
I also like the idea of staring from simple things, but at the same time, we should keep our evaluations start-of-the-art.

Latest revision as of 17:03, 20 February 2005

Hi everybody

What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification?

I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification

As users may have queries regarding different dimensions/facets/criteria, it is desirable to build classifiers on other dimensions than genre. I am particularly interested in predicting Hit/No-hit. It is cool to be a step ahead of fashion.

I also like the idea of staring from simple things, but at the same time, we should keep our evaluations start-of-the-art.