|
37k
|
MIR/MDL Evaluation: Making Progress
|
79 - 80
|
|
J. Stephen Downie, University of Illinois
|
|
| |
|
1.3M
|
Toward Evaluation Techniques for Music Similarity [Keynote Address]
|
81 - 85
|
|
Beth Logan, HP Labs; Daniel P. W. Ellis and Adam Berenzweig, Columbia University
|
|
| |
|
325k
|
Open Position: Multilingual Orchestra Conductor. Lifetime Opportunity.
|
86 - 89
|
|
Eloi Batlle, Enric Guaus, and Jaume Masip, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
|
|
| |
|
96k
|
Emphasizing the Need for TREC-like Collaboration Towards MIR Evaluation
|
90 - 96
|
|
Shyamala Doraisamy and Stefan M. Rüger, Imperial College London
|
|
| |
|
120k
|
If It Sounds As Good As It Looks: Lessons Learned From Video Retrieval Evaluation
|
97 - 102
|
|
Abby A. Goodrum, Syracuse University
|
|
| |
|
103k
|
Comparison of User Ratings of Music in Copyright-free Databases and On-the-market CDs
|
103 - 106
|
|
Keiichiro Hoashi, Kazunori Matsumoto, and Naomi Inoue, KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc.
|
|
| |
|
206k
|
Query by Humming: How Good Can It Get?
|
107 - 109
|
|
Bryan Pardo and William P. Birmingham, University of Michigan
|
|
| |
|
85k
|
Tracks and Topics: Ideas for Structuring Music Retrieval Test Collections and Avoiding Balkanization
|
110 - 113
|
|
Jeremy Pickens, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
|
|
| |
|
133k
|
MIR Benchmarking: Lessons Learned from the Multimedia Community
|
114 - 120
|
|
Josh Reiss and Mark Sandler, University of London
|
|
| |
|
50k
|
Appendix A: Chart of Candidate Music IR Test Collections
|
121 - 123
|
|
Don Byrd, Indiana University
|
|
| |
|
53k
|
Appendix B: ISMIR 2001 Resolution on MIR Evaluation
|
124 - 127
|
|
(taken from https://www-s.isrl.uiuc.edu/~music-ir/gsdl/cgi-bin/resolution.cgi)
|
|
| |
|
337k
|
Appendix C: The TREC-Like Evaluation of Music IR Systems
|
128 - 129
|
|
J. Stephen Downie, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(published in Proceedings of SIGIR 2003)
|
|
| |