Search results

From MIREX Wiki

  • 2009:Best Coding Practices for MIREX
    = Best Coding Practices for MIREX = ...ssions, based on experiences from the previous iteration of MIREX. General best practice information is provided below.
    8 KB (1,292 words) - 13:34, 8 July 2011
  • 2011:MIREX 2011 Submission Instructions
    * Be sure to read through the [[2011:Main_Page| 2011 MIREX Home]] page * Be sure to read though the task pages for which you are submitting
    4 KB (734 words) - 13:39, 8 July 2011
  • 2011:Symbolic Melodic Similarity
    ...see [http://www.esac-data.org/ ESAC Data Homepage] for more information). For each of the six "base" queries, we have created four classes of error-mutat Each system will be asked to return the top ten items for each of the 30 total queries. That is to say, 6(base queries) X 5(versions)
    6 KB (855 words) - 14:10, 8 July 2011
  • MIREX 2011 Submission Instructions
    * Be sure to read through the [[2011:Main_Page| 2011 MIREX Home]] page * Be sure to read though the task pages for which you are submitting
    4 KB (726 words) - 14:09, 8 July 2011
  • 2011:Audio Onset Detection
    ...wo detections for one ground-truth onset) and merged onsets (one detection for two ground-truth onsets) will be taken into account in the evaluation. Doub ...Recall rates are defined by averaging Precision and Recall rates computed for each annotation.
    9 KB (1,363 words) - 14:11, 8 July 2011
  • 2011:Audio Key Detection
    Determination of the key is a prerequisite for any analysis of tonal music. As a result, extensive work has been done in t The collection used for this year's evaluation is the same as the one used in 2005. It consists of
    6 KB (978 words) - 14:54, 8 July 2011
  • 2012:Audio Classification (Train/Test) Tasks
    ...arious audio classification tasks that follow this Train/Test process. For MIREX 2012, five classification sub-tasks are included: All five classification tasks were conducted in previous MIREX runs (please see ). This page presents the evaluation of these tasks, inclu
    11 KB (1,608 words) - 16:39, 7 June 2012
  • MIREX 2012 Submission Instructions
    * Be sure to read through the [[2012:Main_Page| 2012 MIREX Home]] page * Be sure to read though the task pages for which you are submitting
    4 KB (726 words) - 10:34, 2 August 2012
  • 2012:MIREX 2012 Submission Instructions
    * Be sure to read through the [[2012:Main_Page| 2012 MIREX Home]] page * Be sure to read though the task pages for which you are submitting
    4 KB (734 words) - 15:48, 1 August 2012
  • 2012:Symbolic Melodic Similarity
    ...see [http://www.esac-data.org/ ESAC Data Homepage] for more information). For each of the six "base" queries, we have created four classes of error-mutat Each system will be asked to return the top ten items for each of the 30 total queries. That is to say, 6(base queries) X 5(versions)
    5 KB (843 words) - 16:31, 7 June 2012
  • 2012:Audio Onset Detection
    ...wo detections for one ground-truth onset) and merged onsets (one detection for two ground-truth onsets) will be taken into account in the evaluation. Doub ...Recall rates are defined by averaging Precision and Recall rates computed for each annotation.
    9 KB (1,351 words) - 16:32, 7 June 2012
  • 2012:Audio Key Detection
    Determination of the key is a prerequisite for any analysis of tonal music. As a result, extensive work has been done in t The collection used for this year's evaluation is the same as the one used in 2005. It consists of
    6 KB (966 words) - 16:32, 7 June 2012
  • 2012:MIREX Home
    ==Welcome to MIREX 2012== ...a-Champaign ([http://www.illinois.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2012.
    10 KB (1,554 words) - 05:31, 14 March 2013
  • 2013:Audio Classification (Train/Test) Tasks
    ...arious audio classification tasks that follow this Train/Test process. For MIREX 2013, five classification sub-tasks are included: All five classification tasks were conducted in previous MIREX runs (please see ). This page presents the evaluation of these tasks, inclu
    11 KB (1,608 words) - 11:33, 16 June 2013
  • MIREX 2013 Submission Instructions
    * Be sure to read through the [[2013:Main_Page| 2013 MIREX Home]] page * Be sure to read through the task pages for which you are submitting
    4 KB (726 words) - 18:47, 10 June 2013
  • 2013:Symbolic Melodic Similarity
    ...see [http://www.esac-data.org/ ESAC Data Homepage] for more information). For each of the six "base" queries, we have created four classes of error-mutat Each system will be asked to return the top ten items for each of the 30 total queries. That is to say, 6(base queries) X 5(versions)
    5 KB (843 words) - 17:58, 10 June 2013
  • 2013:Audio Onset Detection
    ...wo detections for one ground-truth onset) and merged onsets (one detection for two ground-truth onsets) will be taken into account in the evaluation. Doub ...Recall rates are defined by averaging Precision and Recall rates computed for each annotation.
    9 KB (1,355 words) - 18:00, 10 June 2013
  • 2013:Audio Key Detection
    Determination of the key is a prerequisite for any analysis of tonal music. As a result, extensive work has been done in t The collection used for this year's evaluation is the same as the one used in 2005. It consists of
    6 KB (966 words) - 18:02, 10 June 2013
  • 2013:Main Page
    ==Welcome to MIREX 2013== ...a-Champaign ([http://www.illinois.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2013.
    8 KB (1,225 words) - 22:35, 29 June 2014
  • 2013:Audio K-POP Genre Classification
    ...ation (identification) accuracy, standard deviation and a confusion matrix for each algorithm will be computed. ...dman's Anova with Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) tests for multiple comparisons. This test will be used to rank the algorithms and to
    8 KB (1,219 words) - 02:52, 31 July 2013

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/wiki/Special:Search"