2018:Audio Beat Tracking
- 1 Description
- 2 Data
- 3 Submission Format
- 4 Evaluation Procedures
- 5 Relevant Development Collections
- 6 Time and hardware limits
- 7 Potential Participants
- 8 Discussion
The text of this section was copied from the 2012 Wiki. Please add your comments and discussion at the bottom of this page.
The aim of the automatic beat tracking task is to track each beat locations in a collection of sound files. Unlike the Audio Tempo Extraction task, which aim is to detect tempi for each file, the beat tracking task aims at detecting all beat locations in recordings. The algorithms will be evaluated in terms of their accuracy in predicting beat locations annotated by a group of listeners.
The original 2006 dataset contains 160 30-second excerpts (WAV format) used for the Audio Tempo and Beat contests in 2006. Beat locations have been annotated in each excerpt by 40 different listeners (39 listeners for a few excerpts. The length of each excerpt is 30 seconds. These audio recordings were selected to provide a stable tempo value, a wide distribution of tempi values, and a large variety of instrumentation and musical styles. About 20% of the files contain non-binary meters, and a small number of examples contain changing meters. One disadvantage of using this set for beat tracking is that the tempi are rather stable and this set will not test beat-tracking algorithms in their ability to track tempo changes.
The second collection is comprised of 367 Chopin Mazurkas, represented as full audio tracks (WAV format). The Mazurka dataset contains tempo changes so it will evaluate the ability of algorithms to track these.
The third collection was assembled and donated in 2012. This dataset contains 217 excerpts around 40s each, of which 19 are "easy" and the remaining 198 are "hard". The harder excerpts were drawn from the following musical styles: Romantic music, ﬁlm soundtracks, blues, chanson and solo guitar.
This dataset has been designed for radically new techniques which can contend with challenging beat tracking situations like: quiet accompaniment, expressive timing, changes in time signature, slow tempo, poor sound quality etc. So, if your beat tracker likes a 4/4 time-signature with a steady tempo and needs clear percussive onsets, don't expect it to do very well! But don't be deterred, this is for the good of beat tracking.
You can read in detail about how the dataset was made here: Selective Sampling for Beat Tracking Evaluation
The data are monophonic sound files, with the associated onset times and data about the annotation robustness.
- CD-quality (PCM, 16-bit, 44100 Hz)
- single channel (mono)
- file length between 2 and 36 seconds (total time: 14 minutes)
Submissions to this task will have to conform to a specified format detailed below. Submissions should be packaged and contain at least two files: The algorithm itself and a README containing contact information and detailing, in full, the use of the algorithm.
Participating algorithms will have to read audio in the following format:
- Sample rate: 44.1 KHz
- Sample size: 16 bit
- Number of channels: 1 (mono)
- Encoding: WAV
The beat tracking algorithms will return beat-times in an ASCII text file for each input .wav audio file. The specification of this output file is immediately below.
Output File Format (Audio Beat tracking)
The Beat Tracking output file format is an ASCII text format. Each beat time is specified, in seconds, on its own line. Specifically,
<beat time(in seconds)>\n
where \n denotes the end of line. The < and > characters are not included. An example output file would look something like:
0.243 0.486 0.729
Algorithm Calling Format
The submitted algorithm must take as arguments a SINGLE .wav file to perform the onset detection on as well as the full output path and filename of the output file. The ability to specify the output path and file name is essential. Denoting the input .wav file path and name as %input and the output file path and name as %output, a program called foobar could be called from the command-line as follows:
foobar %input %output foobar -i %input -o %output
Moreover, if your submission takes additional parameters, such as a detection threshold, foobar could be called like:
foobar .1 %input %output foobar -param1 .1 -i %input -o %output
If your submission is in MATLAB, it should be submitted as a function. Once again, the function must contain String inputs for the full path and names of the input and output files. Parameters could also be specified as input arguments of the function. For example:
A README file accompanying each submission should contain explicit instructions on how to to run the program (as well as contact information, etc.). In particular, each command line to run should be specified, using %input for the input sound file and %output for the resulting text file.
For instance, to test the program foobar with different values for parameters param1, the README file would look like:
foobar -param1 .1 -i %input -o %output foobar -param1 .15 -i %input -o %output foobar -param1 .2 -i %input -o %output foobar -param1 .25 -i %input -o %output foobar -param1 .3 -i %input -o %output ...
For a submission using MATLAB, the README file could look like:
matlab -r "foobar(.1,'%input','%output');quit;" matlab -r "foobar(.15,'%input','%output');quit;" matlab -r "foobar(.2,'%input','%output');quit;" matlab -r "foobar(.25,'%input','%output');quit;" matlab -r "foobar(.3,'%input','%output');quit;" ...
The different command lines to evaluate the performance of each parameter set over the whole database will be generated automatically from each line in the README file containing both '%input' and '%output' strings.
The evaluation methods are taken from the beat evaluation toolbox and are described in the following technical report:
M. E. P. Davies, N. Degara and M. D. Plumbley. "Evaluation methods for musical audio beat tracking algorithms". Technical Report C4DM-TR-09-06. This link now works! :)
For further details on the specifics of the methods please refer to the paper. However, here is a brief summary with appropriate references:
- F-measure - the standard calculation as used in onset evaluation but
with a 70ms window.
S. Dixon, "Onset detection revisited," in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Montreal, Canada, pp. 133-137, 2006.
S. Dixon, "Evaluation of audio beat tracking system beatroot," Journal of New Music Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 39-51, 2007.
- Cemgil - beat accuracy is calculated using a Gaussian error function
with 40ms standard deviation.
A. T. Cemgil, B. Kappen, P. Desain, and H. Honing, "On tempo tracking: Tempogram representation and Kalman filtering," Journal Of New Music Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 259-273, 2001
- Goto - binary decision of correct or incorrect tracking based on
statistical properties of a beat error sequence.
M. Goto and Y. Muraoka, "Issues in evaluating beat tracking systems," in Working Notes of the IJCAI-97 Workshop on Issues in AI and Music - Evaluation and Assessment, 1997, pp. 9-16.
- PScore - McKinney's impulse train cross-correlation method as used in
M. F. McKinney, D. Moelants, M. E. P. Davies, and A. Klapuri, "Evaluation of audio beat tracking and music tempo extraction algorithms," Journal of New Music Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2007.
- CMLc, CMLt, AMLc, AMLt - continuity-based evaluation methods based on
the longest continuously correctly tracked section.
S. Hainsworth, "Techniques for the automated analysis of musical audio," Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, 2004.
A. P. Klapuri, A. Eronen, and J. Astola, "Analysis of the meter of acoustic musical signals," IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 342-355, 2006.
- D, Dg - information based criteria based on analysis of a beat error
histogram (note the results are measured in 'bits' and not percentages), see the technical report for a description.
Relevant Development Collections
You can find it here:
User: beattrack Password: b34trx
User: tempo Password: t3mp0
Data has been uploaded in both .tgz and .zip format.
Time and hardware limits
Due to the potentially high number of participants in this and other audio tasks, hard limits on the runtime of submissions will be imposed.
A hard limit of 12 hours will be imposed on analysis times. Submissions exceeding this limit may not receive a result.
name / email
name / email